Discuss R1+R2 continuity both ways in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Well yes but I didn't want to confuse things further, though I'd about used up all my help for one week.

I was taking a R1+R2 reading with the cpc still on the met and all mcbs open . I know this is wrong and can give multiple paths. Just a mistake. This was giving me a continuity reading (albeit a high one) when the light switch was open. I can't quite get my head around this. Was the high R1+R2 measured actually the path back through the sub-station??? Is that what you were saying Richard?
If Neutral and earth are connected in the CU bars and the main switch is closed then when the light switch is open the meter could measure a resistance loop, via the supply neutral earth connection, through the load and this could give a high reading of the sort of level you have measured.

I misread you Anthony and thought you were talking about continuity. Sorry.
No damp areas? Almost like there is something else in the circuit? Or when you IR'd did you have cpc on the bar still with neutral connected?
 
I was taking a R1+R2 reading with the cpc still on the met and all mcbs open . I know this is wrong and can give multiple paths. Just a mistake. This was giving me a continuity reading (albeit a high one) when the light switch was open. I can't quite get my head around this. Was the high R1+R2 measured actually the path back through the sub-station??? Is that what you were saying Richard?
You can see from this diagram that if you were measuring continuity with the circuit fully connected but only the MCB open then the reading with the light switch closed would give a resistance close to the R1+R2 you are trying to measure, if you open the light switch then the only path left is through the load back to neutral and if the main switch is closed then the path can go via the neutral earth link back to the tester.
The high resistance of this path will only lower the R1+R2 resistance reading slightly when measured with the light switch closed (resistors in parallel).
R1+R2 reading via load.jpg
 
Thanks so much for posting this. Very helpful. The bit I couldn't get my head around is the main switch was open in my case. This would negate this path back?

I think I've tracked it down. It seemed to be a suspect pendant (it did have a small crack in it). In any case when I bypassed the pendant the rogue reading went away.
 
Thanks so much for posting this. Very helpful. The bit I couldn't get my head around is the main switch was open in my case. This would negate this path back?

I think I've tracked it down. It seemed to be a suspect pendant (it did have a small crack in it). In any case when I bypassed the pendant the rogue reading went away.
In the case of the main switch being open then this would probably indicate a neutral earth fault on the circuit (or a switch which was not turning off effectively). The appearance of a resistance reading in the say 20 to 900 ohm range tends to indicate measurement through a resistive load, by whatever means. Though this is a broad generalisation.
 
If you're not taking the neutral of the circuit you are testing out of the neutral bar at the CU, then you are effectively IR testing every circuit connected to that neutral bar. If any one of those circuits has a low IR then this will bring down your reading. Surge protectors plugged into a ring main will also show a low IR to earth. I think Powerbreakers show this too??? Also a combination of circuits with acceptable but low IR can combine to give an overall low IR that fails.

Always best to take both live conductors out at CU before IR testing. And I tend to test at 250v first to make sure there's nothing still plugged in or wired in before giving it full 500v. If L-N still shows continuity and I cannot find the thing wired into the circuit then I will just IR test st 250v with L and N tied, to avoid frying the thing. Chances are it's a TV amp or smoke detector or PIR or something equally sensitive to meggering.
 

Reply to R1+R2 continuity both ways in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
I am wiring up a new kitchen and conservatory. I'm not sure why I checked continuity between line and the metal back box of the light switch, but...
Replies
3
Views
723
Over the last few days, I have stumbled across a number of threads that seem to point to a prevalent misunderstanding. Either that, or I have been...
Replies
6
Views
2K
Hi All New to this forum, have read the posts on here from google but only recently signed up. I'm having some issues and some input would be...
Replies
13
Views
1K
Hi everyone :) my first post here. Quick background I'm a newly qualified installer of somewhat advanced years whose just starting out in the...
Replies
12
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock