Discuss PIR coding in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Different ways of interpreting the term 'readily accessible', how odd.
To my mind, something is 'readily accessible', if it can be accessed without the use of a key, tool or access equipment.
Access equipment being ladders, MEWPs, helicopters, etc.
 
To be on the safe side just remove the fitting and re-mount it on a piece of timber bigger than the base of the fitting with a hole drilled through it only just big enough for the supply cable.
 
To be on the safe side just remove the fitting and re-mount it on a piece of timber bigger than the base of the fitting with a hole drilled through it only just big enough for the supply cable.

You are right , it needs sorting as.

Quote the OP---


"Meaning due to the size of the fitting its possible for someone to put there hand above the
fitting and go into the connection behind..
 
I don't follow, what is the problem?

No problem Dave, it's puzzled me for a while now how normal lamp holders are still allowed.
Often accessible without steps, live parts accessible without the use of a tool. Just take the lamp out.
Same with table lamps.

The code question was rhetorical.
 
Last edited:
No problem Dave, it's puzzled me for a while now how normal lamp holders are still allowed.
Often accessible without steps, live parts accessible without the use of a tool. Just take the lamp out.
Same with table lamps.

The code question was rhetorical.

That is basically grudgingly permitted through the historical existence of the standard.
Basically there is no simple way to get rid of them!

If you look at a more modern mains rated lampholder design like the GU10 then it's got a much better IP
 
It's a very good point, I suppose the difference is anyone in their right mind would expect there to be a potentially lethal voltage present within a lampholder so will avoid getting fingers too close, the other scenario is all about preventing accidental contact when the danger isn't as clearly perceived.
 
I would assume the live parts would be in some sort of connector and not likely to be able to be touched so not a shock hazard. So I would give it a 3 at the very most, and probably not code it at all. As above could you not put a disk of some sort of material over it?
 
I would assume the live parts would be in some sort of connector and not likely to be able to be touched so not a shock hazard. So I would give it a 3 at the very most, and probably not code it at all. As above could you not put a disk of some sort of material over it?

Assume, some sort, not likely,

All nice definite terms to be basing a professional decision and safety report on!
 
The op has still not answered my question as to why a pir is being carried out on a new install , mind you i don't think the op as returned at all, i am enjoying the debate about the lamp holder , i would go down the line that only an idiot would put their fingers in a lamp holder , but somone not thinking could be their hand inside the open part of the fitting .
 
To my mind, something is 'readily accessible', if it can be accessed without the use of a key, tool or access equipment.

To mine, these don't belong in the same category. If someone uses a key or tool to detach or open something, they will be aware that whatever was previously behind / within will become exposed. OTOH if they use access equipment for some unrelated purpose like cleaning or decorating, they wouldn't anticipate suddenly being exposed to an existing but hidden electrical hazard.

Turned around, if you popped a downlighter out to change a transformer and a bunch of venomous spiders fell out onto you without warning, would you be happy with the explanation 'I keep them up there because they are only accessible from a ladder.'
 

Reply to PIR coding in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Was doing an EICR and pulled out the oven to have a butchers to see if there was a connection unit or not. Hob and oven connected into same...
Replies
4
Views
823
I know how I was taught to test a RCD, 6 tests in all two no go, two under 300 mS and 2 under 40 mS with no load. But thinking about it not so...
Replies
7
Views
3K
Yes, it's another EICR coding question - hurrah! :blush: Inspecting a small 1 bed 70s ex-council flat that was going well. Main Bonding had...
Replies
12
Views
7K
Morning all, I’ve recently bought a new house with an old alarm system that didn’t work and was located in the downstairs toilet. I’ve rewired it...
Replies
2
Views
2K
Hi guys, As a way of learning/getting my head around the regs I do mock condition reports if I see something I don't think is quite right but...
Replies
5
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock