- Reaction score
- 8,192
Looks nice
Discuss The Future of Fuse boards...? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
I really can't see the point of cutting a cable entry hole that size in the back board.
Looks nice
It is a pre punched knock outI really can't see the point of cutting a cable entry hole that size in the back board.
In the wooden partition.It is a pre punched knock out
didn't you see the video? It's to prepare for all the future circuits for your battery banks and electric car charging points! (If you can afford it after spending all your money on the CU) Just feed the cable into the already made hole...In the wooden partition.
Except that they probably wouldn't come in from the back.didn't you see the video? It's to prepare for all the future circuits for your battery banks and electric car charging points! (If you can afford it after spending all your money on the CU) Just feed the cable into the already made hole...
Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?In the wooden partition.
It's into a partition, nothing is going to be easy to get back entry into that CU.Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?
Exactly! The enclosure is not air tight, and heat inside will be fanned into flames by the chimney effect of the void. just like nominally non flammable insulation on the outside of high rise buildings.The large hole helps vent the flames into the wall void.
Going with that logic, they may as well knock all of them out, that would make it a lot easier.Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?
As far as is reasonably practicable, to contain any fire within the enclosure or cabinet and to minimise the escape of flames.Totally irrelevant. And there is nothing in the Regs about making a CU 'airtight' , if anything that's counter productive as we're told to install in such a way to minimise the build up of heat or words to that effect.
Intumescent foam, of course.Won't be long before everyone is filling a consumer unit with expanding foam
Might have been before the sparky pulled them out the way to get his cables down.There shouldn't be a chimney effect as there should be cavity barriers for this purpose.
Here we go againImagine telling a customer that they need to spend a load of money on a new metal consumer unit, telling them how much safer it is in a fire and then leaving a dirty great hole in their wall partition.
There is no argument for not sealing it up.
I think that most people would know what Brian meant when saying “airtight”.Totally irrelevant. And there is nothing in the Regs about making a CU 'airtight' , if anything that's counter productive as we're told to install in such a way to minimise the build up of heat or words to that effect.
Has the penetration breached a fire compartment because if not no further action is required.I think that most people would know what Brian meant when saying “airtight”.
Also, I don't understand how you can disagree about leaving a dirty, great hole in a wall cavity.
Have a read of section 527.
Has the penetration breached a fire compartment because if not no further action is required.
No metal consumer units are not fire barriers because if they were then you would spend a considerable amount of money on them plus their Achilles heel would be cable entries and the protective devices. Metal consumer units are used because the enclosure does not readily combust, no more. You are misinformed.The metal CU should be treated as a form of fire barrier/containment, that being the whole reason for having metal CUs in the first place.
Cutting a hole that size in a wooden partition and leaving it cannot be said to be the work of a decent electrician.
I said “They should be treated” I didn't say “They are fire barriers”.No metal consumer units are not fire barriers because if they were then you would spend a considerable amount of money on them plus their Achilles heel would be cable entries and the protective devices. Metal consumer units are used because the enclosure does not readily combust, no more. You are misinformed.
You are giving incorrect information because just by stating this you believe it is a fire barrier. Common sense and fact are not necessarily the same because the size of entry is irrelevant and requires no sealing if it does not breech a fire compartment.I said “They should be treated” I didn't say “They are fire barriers”.
Common sense would tell you that cable entries that are sealed are going to act as a barrier.
. What constitutes a ‘non-combustible enclosure’?You are giving incorrect information because just by stating this you believe it is a fire barrier. Common sense and fact are not necessarily the same because the size of entry is irrelevant and requires no sealing if it does not breech a fire compartment.
It's purpose is not to contain a fire it is not a fire barrier. This is a common misconception.. What constitutes a ‘non-combustible enclosure’?
A non-combustible enclosure includes base, cover, door and any components e.g. hinges, covers, screws and catches, necessary to maintain fire containment. See diagram 1. Blanks and devices are contained within the non-combustible enclosure.
3 How is account taken of cable entries into a ‘non-combustible enclosure’ with respect to
containment of internal fire and escape of flames?.
Good workmanship and proper materials must be applied by the installer. The cable installation entry method shall, as far as is reasonably practicable, maintain the fire containment of the enclosure. Account shall be taken of the manufacturers instructions, if any.
It's purpose is not to contain a fire it is not a fire barrier. This is a common misconception.
But it isn't a fire barrier and is the partition a fire compartment boundary. Do you want a spade.It will be more of a fire barrier being metal than it would being made of wood, like that partition.
Regardless of the soundless/ strength of the argument I'm afraid some people argue just for the sake of it.Out of interest. Do those who object to holes in the back of a DB insist upon installation of an interconnected smoke detection system, prior to upgrade of any domestic board?
Surely early detection of all types of fire would be of much greater importance than the short term containment of one unlikely source of fire.
At no time have I advocated a huge cable entry hole, and assumptions are being made constantly. The vast majority of CUs that I replace are spaced off on small battens to facilitate all cables entering through the rear knockout. So in fact there is no hole going into a cavity at all. But when some people are convinced they're right and no one else knows what they're talking about then it's probably a waste of time posting at all.
But it isn't a fire barrier and is the partition a fire compartment boundary. Do you want a spade.
No. The reason was because many of todays highly qualified dipsticks were incapable of installing non metal CU's correctly, causing an increasing danger of domestic CU fires. (in the London area, at least)The metal CU should be treated as a form of fire barrier/containment, that being the whole reason for having metal CUs in the first place.
Cutting a hole that size in a wooden partition and leaving it cannot be said to be the work of a decent electrician.
The issue is about leaving a massive hole into a wooden partition.
If some are happy to leave an installation like that, then good on them.
If it breeches a fire barrier then it is an issue. Define the parameters of a massive hole.The issue is about leaving a massive hole into a wooden partition.
If some are happy to leave an installation like that, then good on them.
That is much the preferred way.....and my way, mounted on ply wood with the timber hole filed smooth, smaller than the metal one, negating the need for grommet strip.At no time have I advocated a huge cable entry hole, and assumptions are being made constantly. The vast majority of CUs that I replace are spaced off on small battens to facilitate all cables entering through the rear knockout. So in fact there is no hole going into a cavity at all. But when some people are convinced they're right and no one else knows what they're talking about then it's probably a waste of time posting at all.
Yes, you're correct if fire got into that partition it would be an issue.If it breeches a fire barrier then it is an issue. Define the parameters of a massive hole.
Reply to The Future of Fuse boards...? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.