Discuss Working in Schools? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
Schools in my area have their own budgets and are able to employ contractors without having to use council approved contractors. NICEIC approved contractors are stipulated though. Most will require a documented H&S policy,and a current DBS check . Dont forget to ask to see the asbestos register before starting or quoting any work.
This is what get my rag - NICEIC is one of a number of bodies out there and to stipulate one is in breach of fair competition laws, the catch 22 though is if you challenge it then you might as well wave goodbuy to a chance of winning the contract.
Thanks guys, much appreciated.
I've definitely got the job but I'm still unsure on how they pay?
Thanks guys, much appreciated.
I've definitely got the job but I'm still unsure on how they pay?
Thanks guys, much appreciated.
I've definitely got the job but I'm still unsure on how they pay?
This is what get my rag - NICEIC is one of a number of bodies out there and to stipulate one is in breach of fair competition laws, the catch 22 though is if you challenge it then you might as well wave goodbuy to a chance of winning the contract.
Agreed,as you state it is because the NICEIC were the original body and remain the only one widely known by the public. I'll wager if you stated ELECSA,STROMA NAPIT etc to just about anyone outside of the electrical industry you'll get a blank look.
What most people dont seem to get is only the nic, napit and ECA assess you for commercial and industrial work as well, the others cover only domestic work so are not within the scope required in the first place
the school i work for accept either of these 3 and thats fair enough i think, but if your looking at working in the public sector on commercial works why would you even consider elecsa or stroma etc, it makes no sense
They do regarding energy saving schemes dave but I haven't seen a approved contractor status with them which is for companies carrying out other than Domestic work, they also need accredation themselves from others like EXOR for example before they get respect with Local authorities like the NICEIC currently does. New schemes like Stroma need to prove themselves first to County councils, currently they are concidered nothing more than a Part P scheme, perhaps they are building for the future but they have a way to go.No, BSI and Stroma also assess you for non domestic work
Napit is a laughed at scheme usually, there have been horror stories about them only carrying out 18 month checks and assessors with limited scope knowledge, they have a long way to go also before getting county council respect outside Domestic scope, JMO oh and JME.What most people dont seem to get is only the nic, napit and ECA assess you for commercial and industrial work as well, the others cover only domestic work so are not within the scope required in the first place
the school i work for accept either of these 3 and thats fair enough i think, but if your looking at working in the public sector on commercial works why would you even consider elecsa or stroma etc, it makes no sense
They do regarding energy saving schemes dave but I haven't seen a approved contractor status with them which is for companies carrying out other than Domestic work, they also need accredation themselves from others like EXOR for example before they get respect with Local authorities like the NICEIC currently does. New schemes like Stroma need to prove themselves first to County councils, currently they are concidered nothing more than a Part P scheme, perhaps they are building for the future but they have a way to go.
I am not doubting they are trying to gain certification away from the domestic sector Dave, just saying as far as councils are concerned they cannot justify it yet, it is too new for them, they need to prove it first. Look I don't make these comments lightly mate, I have attended County council meetings where contractors have asked the funding side of it about using other schemes and they have said that napit had to step up a gear and were falling short on conditions which were needed to be adhered to before being reckonised as compliant, they fell short on inspections times and inspector numbers along with other issues regading accounts access etc to be regarding in the same manner in their opinion as the NICEIC. Dave I don't like the fact the NICEIC dominate the councils but their approved contractor status is currently way ahead of the other schemes who are more concerned with Domestic systems. I appreciate Napit and Stroma etc are trying to gain credibility there, and will do so of course eventually but currently are way short on a lot of councils opinion, right or wrong, I am just saying what I have heard several times. And Napit are ahead of Stroma at the moment, Stroma is still very new.
Yes I agree, but that is what the county councils want, they have been running an approved contractor scheme for 40 years plus now and therefore are the accepted body of the Local authorities, the rest need to catch up, but are a way back yet.Well we are all truly ****ed if the NICEIC are considered to be above the British standards institute!
But the BS are standards not a regulary body sending out inspectors annually checking work from approved contractors in schools and libraries etc, big difference, I am not NICEIC friendly, just pointing out the obvious, for Stroma to gain acceptance by most councils as a competition to the NICEIC they need to up thier game and get away from the Part P schemes they seem to get attention in, there are few houses in county council control, it is schools and police/fire stations and libraiers etc etc, the city councils deal with housing, and this thread is about county council requirements.Well we are all truly ****ed if the NICEIC are considered to be above the British standards institute!
But the BS are standards not a regulary body sending out inspectors annually checking work from approved contractors in schools and libraries etc, big difference, I am not NICEIC friendly, just pointing out the obvious, for Stroma to gain acceptance by most councils as a competition to the NICEIC they need to up thier game and get away from the Part P schemes they seem to get attention in, there are few houses in county council control, it is schools and police/fire stations and libraiers etc etc, the city councils deal with housing, and this thread is about county council requirements.
Never heard of them inspecting members and the NICEIC do have 11000, it is no good trying to argue Stromas case, they will need to adapt to a scheme inspecting Commercial and Industrial work by letting the Local authorities know and by adhereing to the local authorities requirements, they are not there yet, they are new and trying to get there, they will, but at the moment the NICEIC have the market with the Approved contractor scheme, I have been doing this 33 years and have been to dozens of meetings, I am not making this up, I have seen Napit attempt to get in the door and fall due to not meeting requirments, they are also too pro Part P, to get into the schools most, not all but Most Local authorities want the established NICEIC, it is a fact and for it to change the others need to up their game lol.The BSI scheme does do exactly that, the same as all of the other schemes
The thing is with the NICEIC the inspectors are different from the Domestic installer inspectors, the NICEIC treat the 2 bodies as different bodies, the same organisation but they keep them apart, If stroma did a similar thing and could adhere to the L A requirements they may get in the door, but they are associated with Part P only, bad marketing, I have just looked at their site and nothing stands out as anything other than Domestic and Green at first look to me.
Never heard of them inspecting members and the NICEIC do have 11000, it is no good trying to argue Stromas case, they will need to adapt to a scheme inspecting Commercial and Industrial work by letting the Local authorities know and by adhereing to the local authorities requirements, they are not there yet, they are new and trying to get there, they will, but at the moment the NICEIC have the market with the Approved contractor scheme, I have been doing this 33 years and have been to dozens of meetings, I am not making this up, I have seen Napit attempt to get in the door and fall due to not meeting requirments, they are also too pro Part P, to get into the schools most, not all but Most Local authorities want the established NICEIC, it is a fact and for it to change the others need to up their game lol.
So your saying all Electrical contractors on the NICEIC Approved contractor scheme do a **** job then? one word Dave=Bollox
I have known the schools caretaker to carry out work on the schools in the past Dave lol, you will always get good and bad sparks, regarding the NICEIC, I am not interested in them myself these days either, but the thread was asking a question about what you need to work in primary schools, I was answering the OP with a constructive realistic view, some schools however are allowed to spend their own money how they please, in that case they can employ anyone, so that said the NICEIC doesn't matter in those cases.I'm not interested in arguing stromas case, I'm far more interesting in the case against the NICEIC.
I have two local schools on my customer list, and the state of the work carried out there in recent years by the county council approved contractors is diabolical to say the least, they can stick their NICEIC registration as all it seems to guarantee these days is that a **** job will be done.
Well I was a member for years and won awards on large projects, I also know of several good companies in their approved contractor scheme, to suggest all NICEIC approved contractors do a **** job is just plain untrue and also unfair on many of the guys on here who are also forced to be with them to keep local authorities happy.It certainly appears that way based on the **** I've had to deal with in the last couple of years. What about the people on here who loudly proclaim their membership of the NICEIC yet clearly haven't got a clue?
Of course it's a generalisation and there must be some top notch installers on the list. But none of is ever gets called out to deal with their ****ups.
I have known the schools caretaker to carry out work on the schools in the past Dave lol, you will always get good and bad sparks, regarding the NICEIC, I am not interested in them myself these days either, but the thread was asking a quetion about what you need to work in primary schools, I was answering the OP with a constructive realistic view, some schools however are allowed to spend their own money how they please, in that case they can employ anyone, so that said the NICEIC doesn't matter in those cases.
It is up to Stroma and Napit and the others to prove to the L A that they have the facilities in place to monitor contractors properly, when they do that hopefully the NICEIC hold will crumble.
Where have you got that from? I was inspected every 12 months without fail, took him around 2-3 jobs and he sat in the office examining all the paperwork etc, year in year out. Regarding a clark of works, we had one twenty years ago but the council sacked him to save money, I agree it is a good way forward, maybe some councils still employ them, I have no idea if they do but some may.Which seems a tad unfair when the NICEIC don't monitor contractors properly!
Why can't a clerk of works from the LA actually look at the work that has been carried out and see when if is sub standard?
Where have you got that from? I .
As I said earlier, the shocking state of the work carried out by some NICEIC registered contractors. You cannot say they are monitoring/assessing contractors properly when they are carrying out woefully substandard work
I'd have to agree with MDJ. The annual assessment process for approved contractors is pretty thorough.
I'd very much like to see some actual evidence of a shocking standard of work carried out by NICEIC approved contractors.
I'll see what I can do, I might be able to get a copy of the joke of an EICR I was looking at last week.
I'll see of I can get some pictures of the **** I've come across at the school next time I'm there.
That is interesting Dave, it is 10 here in Glos, and still tough to get on that list, so 4, well it is a cartel isn't it lol and wrong really at that low amount.Surrey, Essex and Kent use the same method of contracting. And this is separated into 2 categories. High value and Low.
The County councils deal with high values, and only 4 main registered construction companies can tender for the contract. The company and all its subcontractors, Must have Construction Online certification. Plus relevant approval ie NICIEE. Without this, or being on the approve list, you wont get a look in. The lower value under £40k is down to the schools own budget, and they can employ who they wish....If you have the chance of bidding here, this is an opportunity to get on their approved list.
Yes I agree, there will obviously be a few bad eggs in every county but generally yes they will be of a higher standard because as wirepuller pointed out the inspection process is thourough in the approved contractor accreditation system, regarding the Domestic installer lol, well no comment there.I would guess the bigger the company(especially using subbies alot) the more the standards could drop and poor work does slip past, but in my experience with smaller outfits and one man bands, Approved contractors generally do have a higher standard of work
Just looked on the Surrey Approved list, and there not on it.....mmmm
Reply to Working in Schools? in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.