- Reaction score
- 39
These RCBO don't have functional earth. Thanksdoes the RCBO have a functional earth wire that remained connected?
Discuss Niceic Assesment in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
These RCBO don't have functional earth. Thanksdoes the RCBO have a functional earth wire that remained connected?
Here is updated installation certificate guys! Please have a look and point out any area I need to improve.Thanks again.On the report (that isn't back up yet) I think it was 5 Mohms for one circuit and 7 Mohms for other.
I know they both pass.
I had an email from assessor to email him IEC. Please advise if it is good enough to emailed to him. Could you please information why insulation reader is lesser when testing between Live-Earth than live- live?ThanksI see I completely mis-remembered and the IR was 18Mohms. Unless you have time on your hands I'd leave that.
The main thing with this (and other comments) was you having a comment ready for an assessor picking it up. I've known assessors not give an IEC a 2nd glance, and a different one spent 30 minutes talking about it! Luck of the draw really....
I had an email from assessor to email him IEC. Please advise if it is good enough to emailed to him. Could you please information why insulation reader is lesser when testing between Live-Earth than live- live?Thanks
The test instrument/s are identified by serial number. For an existing installation and consumer unit replacement there is no way an assessor would question omitting line to neutral insulation resistance testing, they are existing circuits so the test is irrelevant. Writing twaddle like sensitive equipment etc.... is too much information it is not important.
Sorry, I don't have an answer for that. I'd be content the readings exceed GN3 pass values if I were you.Could you please information why insulation reader is lesser when testing between Live-Earth than live- live?
Yes I agree the EIC should not show Limitations I did not really view it. I just leave them blank no assessor is going to care for an existing installation.Well that is what I got taught by multiple instructors and tutors. an EICR you can put whatever limitations you want as long as you list them, you can omit entire circuits if you want, say you were doing an EICR for a flooded house, presuming the cu was well above the flood level, there is no point needing to test the upstairs sockets or lighting...
An EIC I was always taught should not have any limitations, although in the real world I agree its not always practicable, my point was putting LIM on all L-N makes it look like he just cant be bothered to do it or is testing like an EICR, where do you stop, LIM on L-CPC just incase. Cant be bothered to do R1+R2, might as well LIM that, and Zs cause you LIM R1+R2 would have to be done live, so might as well LIM that as well..
Different electricians fill out the forms differently and different electricians believe what they do is correct but think about it, in EICR's there is a part for limitations, this is not in an EIC. If limitations were allowed why would you not have the same part that is in an EICR to write limitations in an EIC?
Different assessors focus on different things. Mine last picked me up on not having fire rated clips on my conduit... In a plastic shed... When I pointed this out he was like "Oh um yeah well obviously here its ok but I meant just in general dont forget them."
Thanks for your valueable comments. In my humble opinion this is not new installation.I changed the consumer unit and installed a new circuit for smoke alarm .I mentioned this underWell that is what I got taught by multiple instructors and tutors. an EICR you can put whatever limitations you want as long as you list them, you can omit entire circuits if you want, say you were doing an EICR for a flooded house, presuming the cu was well above the flood level, there is no point needing to test the upstairs sockets or lighting...
An EIC I was always taught should not have any limitations, although in the real world I agree its not always practicable, my point was putting LIM on all L-N makes it look like he just cant be bothered to do it or is testing like an EICR, where do you stop, LIM on L-CPC just incase. Cant be bothered to do R1+R2, might as well LIM that, and Zs cause you LIM R1+R2 would have to be done live, so might as well LIM that as well..
Different electricians fill out the forms differently and different electricians believe what they do is correct but think about it, in EICR's there is a part for limitations, this is not in an EIC. If limitations were allowed why would you not have the same part that is in an EICR to write limitations in an EIC?
Different assessors focus on different things. Mine last picked me up on not having fire rated clips on my conduit... In a plastic shed... When I pointed this out he was like "Oh um yeah well obviously here its ok but I meant just in general dont forget them."
Reply to Niceic Assesment in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.