- Reaction score
- 2,833
14th edition bit behind the times Mate, it's the 18th now nearly
It was a christmas present to myself, along with a VERY reasonably priced PDF copy of the 18th edition plus OSG I got off ebay
Discuss I never install ring circuits, the potential for danger is unacceptable in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
14th edition bit behind the times Mate, it's the 18th now nearly
But you quoted regs from the 14th, why when you say you have a digital copy of the 18th ludicrous.It was a christmas present to myself, along with a VERY reasonably priced PDF copy of the 18th edition plus OSG I got off ebay
Agree wholeheartedly with your postNothing worse than what you call a 'tree circuit' for fault finding. Five or six legs, may be more and testing at each when installed, too. Rubbish.
Postie did it ! (we have a few women !)Who woke up the sleeping dogs.
Shits me to tears especially when the junction box is inaccessible.
What if the fault is with the cpc on a radial. Still works, no-one is the wiser. Your argument is flawed.Yes but the point is people will mess with these things. With a radial or a tree, a disconnected live conductor means whatever is downstream stops working - fault is obvious and it gets checked out.
Not the case with a RFC. In my opinion that’s bad design. You have to factor this inevitability into the design, and I do, that’s why I don’t install RFC’s.
Reply to I never install ring circuits, the potential for danger is unacceptable in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net
We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.